When couples don't sign an antenuptial contract before their wedding, they are automatically married in community of property. This means that both parties equally share the risk and benefits of a joint estate.
Their estate will be regarded as one estate, and they will both be liable for the debts and other liabilities, regardless of which one of them had incurred the debt.
This can have serious implications for the partner where the spouse incurs serious debt, for example from a failed business venture or gambling debts.
A marriage out of community of property is regulated with the use of an antenuptial contract. An Antenuptial Contract can be registered with or without accrual.
Marriage out of community of property with accrual has the same benefits as one without accrual.
However, with a marriage out of community of property with accrual, cognisance is taken of the contributions each partner makes to the acquisition of assets during the marriage.
An example of the recognition of the role that each partner plays in supporting the other spouse is understanding that women are, more often than not, disadvantaged by their child bearing role within the family.
While the husband is able to continue working, the wife may be forced to adopt a more family supportive role.
Before you get married, contact Van Deventer & Van Deventer Incorporated for an antenuptial agreement (otherwise known as a prenup, or prenuptial agreement) between you and your spouse, which will regulate the marital property issues flowing from your union through marriage.
Without an antenuptial contract, couples are automatically deemed to be married in community of property.
We would be happy to assist you plan properly for your married life together with your partner with an antenuptial contract. Please feel free to contact our attorneys in Johannesburg for advice on all your options.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Estate Agent Training
Bond & Transfer Calculator
Everything you wanted to know about Antenuptial Contracts and an easy form to complete.
The Women’s Legal Centre had in 2009, brought a petition to the Constitutional Court for direct access in terms of Section 167 of the Constitution, seeking relief from the Court to direct the state to recognize marriages concluded under Muslim law.
Read More ...Posted by Cor van Deventer on Monday, January 11, 2021 Views: 116